Representative, State of Washington

West 920 Riverside, Suite 594

Spokane, Washington 99201

Re: Letter on May 7,1999 alluding to help with the IRS.

Dear Representative Nethercutt,

It is with sad and very disappointed feelings that I must write this letter. I can only hope that you will take the time out of your very busy schedule to read and consider what I have to say. I will try to keep it as short and to the point as I can.

Your letter of May 7, 1999 said: "It was a pleasure helping you..." May I ask, what help? Neither you nor any other legislator will address the questions many others and I have asked many times; only to be shuffled off to the bureaucracy as usual. You refuse to address the illegal activities of the IRS. I do not want the IRS to give me ANYTHING. I requested you to address a question on their "Jurisdiction", and not on time to appeal to an illegal non-judicial administrative body.

Once again I will ask you to answer my questions on the facts not on what the IRS tries to make one believe.

Sir, do you remember the promise you gave me the first time we met and I informed you that this was NOT a Democracy, but a Republic according to the Constitution of the [u]nited States of America? Do you recall what you said about obtaining the votes of those who support the Republic, and have NO use for the CORPORATE DEMOCRACY? I do!

Is it true that in "In 1938, all the higher judges, the top attorneys, and the U.S. Attorneys were called into a secret meeting and this is what they were told: "America is a bankrupt nation. It is owned completely by its creditors. The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the State Governments. Take silent judicial notice of this fact, but never reveal it openly. Your court is operating under Admiralty Jurisdiction--call it anything you want, but do not call it Admiralty?"

Were you told the same thing once you were elected? Is that the reason you have gone back on your word? (Emphases mine)

In Pollard vs. Farmers Loan & trust Co. 158 U.S. 601 1895 the Supreme Court ruled that "unapportioned taxes and taxes on income were unconstitutional." In Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1839 under the term "Capitation" states; "(Lat. Caput, head). A poll tax. An imposition yearly laid upon each person.' The constitution of the United States provides that "no capitation or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census, or enumeration, thereinbefore directed to be taken." Art.1, s. 9, n. 4. See Hylton vs. U.S., 3 Dall. (U.S.) 171, 1 L. Ed. 556; Loughborough v. Blake, 5 Wheat. (U.S.) 317, 5 L. Ed. 98."

In 1939 Congress attempted to impose a Temporary Income Tax on the "several states" of the union, and called it a Victory Tax on individuals. However, on May 29, 1944 (58 Statues At Large, Chap. 210. Pg. 234), the victory tax and its provisions were repealed. There is no longer a law making a citizen of the 50 states "liable" [I believe that's the key word] for paying income taxes on their compensation for labor. Likewise, there is no memorialized law authorizing an employer to withhold, and turn over to the government, a significant portion of compensation earned by a citizen of the 50 independent states of the union.

Let's look at Section 6. Repeal Of the Victory Tax.

a.In general, subchapter D of Chapter 1, (relating to the Victory tax) "is repealed".

All laws, which have general applicability to the citizens of the union of the American States, must be published in the Federal Register. On Tuesday, Sept 7, 1943 the Federal Register published the following, concerning the Withholding of Compensation as follows:

[ 8 Federal Register, Pg. 12264 § 404.102 ] was applicable to withholding on Government Employees, as follows:

"Salaries paid officials by Government, or Government agency, or instrumentalities are subject to withholding".

As I do not live in any of the territories or states as defined in 42 USC 410 (h)(i) and was born in the Sovereign state of Florida [not Corporate state], none of this applies to me. Since I have educated myself on the FRAUD of the Federal system and their agencies [IRS, Etc.], I have now revoked all signature on the 1040, 1040X and 1099, as I was fraudulently led to believe I was required to sign them.

I must add another item to this. That being The Public Salary Act: On April 12th, 1939 [THE Congress, 1st, Session, Chap. 59, Pgs. 574-575]. This act is buried between the 1939 Code and the 1954 Code, and many citizens are not aware of its existence. The following section of this act has never been repealed. This is extremely significant because it amends, and redefines the words "GROSS INCOME"; to include only compensation for services [as public servants] earned by officers, and employees of the state. The word "including" means "only", and cannot be expanded to add other elements not within the "exact" meaning of the definition. The meaning here is government employees of one of the territories or states as defined in 42 USC 410(h)(i). PUBLIC SALARY ACT OF 1939. Title 1, Section 1. § 22(a) of the IRC. Refer to IRC 6331(a). (Emphasis mine)

Mr. Bill Benson has proven [in the books The Law That Never Was], beyond a shadow of a doubt that the so-called 16th amendment was NEVER approved by the several states of the union. You have a copy of his books in your office. 1700 Certified pages prove that. However, there is even a more important fact to consider. That is, in all instances where the constitution was properly amended and adopted, two very important elements exist. One being the "Enabling Clause", and the other being the "Enforcement Clause". Ie. "BE IT ENACTED BY.. ..." and "Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

As neither is present, that in itself nullifies the Fraud. Why will you NOT comment on this fraud? Have they warned you as they did all those in 1939?

I must thank you for at least responding. That is more that I can say for the two Senators. I plan to make sure as many hundred people as I can get this information so they can be better informed at the next election. I for one am tired of wasting my time and valuable resources constantly being harassed by the IRS and having to respond to UNSIGNED or fraudulent signed demands for money or trying to get me back into their venue. I'm a Native American, not a U.S. [CORPORATE] citizen, and just want them to get my name off their list. I do not manufacture, or sell Alcohol, Tobacco or Firearms. From my master file they have me running drugs and other illegal stuff from one of the territories. It's sad when we elect people and they run scared. Who represents whom?

One more reference. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. A.A. Merrill 332 U.S. 380, where the court said. "Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who he purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority."

Here the Supreme Court in this decision warns the public that those who pay attention to what federal employees say "take the risk" that such employees may not be acting "within the bounds of (their) authority." Note: Millions of us are aware that the IRS is NOT a federal agency, but in fact works for the IMF.

Well, I'm not prepared to take that "risk". That was why I ask for you and the other "LEGISLATORS" to address my concerns. I now see that was an exercise in futility.

I am proud that while I served as a County Commissioner, God gave me the intestinal fortitude to give the people a direct answer. If I did not know the answer I would so state. Then I would tell them "but I will find out for you". I did not run for office to be politically correct only to serve my country as I did when in the military. I took an oath to uphold the constitution against ALL ENEMIES both foreign and domestic. I will never go back on that oath. I wish I could have retained the trust and faith I once had in you. However, I do not judge you, you must stand before your maker one day and he will judge you.

Once when I was warned to not be so truthful or I would not be re-elected, I answered: I would much rather tell the truth here on earth and take the consequences of the socialistic governments and their rogues than to have to stand before God on judgement day and be remanded to hell to burn for eternity. Each of us must make our own bed. However, I would surmise that a bed of fire is hard to sleep in.

Please forgive me for such a long letter. I doubt if you will have time to read it. However, just maybe one of your assistance will and inform you of its contents.

I will attach a copy of the last letter where I responded to the IRS. I will not however include the 26 pages of revocation of signatures. Should you like to see a copy, please advise. The SUPPOSED Secretary of the Treasury has one. However, there are some of us who know there is no such person in the U.S. Gov. now.

May God have mercy on you and the other elected legislators!

Respectfully;

J.D. Anderson

P.O. Box 276

Kettle Falls, Washington [99141]